“Highly unprofessional”: Author of the 2025 LAFD wildfire after‑action report rejects final draft after major sections removed
Thank you for choosing Automatic Translation. Currently we are offering translations from English into French and German, with more translation languages to be added in the near future. Please be aware that these translations are generated by a third party AI software service. While we have found that the translations are mostly correct, they may not be perfect in every case. To ensure the information you read is correct, please refer to the original article in English. If you find an error in a translation which you would like to bring to our attention, it would help us greatly if you let us know. We can correct any text or section, once we are aware of it. Please do not hesitate to contact our webmaster to let us know of any translation errors.
Los Angeles: The battalion chief who authored the Palisades Fire after‑action report declined to endorse the final release, arguing that extensive edits distorted his conclusions, eliminated key failures, and failed to meet the department’s professional standards.
According to FireRescue.com, Battalion Chief Kenneth Cook, who wrote the original assessment, after the report’s public release on Oct. 8, said the final draft contained “substantial modifications” and “significant deletions” that altered his conclusions.
Cook called the published version “highly unprofessional and inconsistent with our established standards” and urged the department to reconsider releasing it in its current form.
“Having reviewed the revised version submitted by your office, I must respectfully decline to endorse it in its current form,” Cook wrote.
“The document has undergone substantial modifications and contains significant deletions of information that, in some instances, alter the conclusions originally presented.”
On December 31, 2025, the LAFD wrote on their own home age:
"A public records request was submitted for the Palisades After-Action Review, including all associated draft documents. In response, the Department has released the requested records, including draft versions of the report.... Please be advised -- drafts of the after-action report are working documents, not final findings. They often include preliminary analysis and internal discussion that are refined through review. Releasing drafts without context can create confusion or misinterpretation, particularly when those materials were never intended to represent final conclusions.
A separate report from AOL News confirmed Cook’s objections and noted that he warned the edited version could conflict with an independent state‑commissioned review of the January wildfires ordered by the governor’s office.
Further Reading:
https://www.aol.com/news/author-lafd-palisades-fire-report-194904766.html
https://lafd.org/news/palisades-afteraction-review-report-drafts-and-final
https://deadline.com/2025/10/palisades-fire-lafd-internal-report-released-1236574086/
Photo Credit: Wikipedia Creative Commons License . Public Domain
-
File:Homes destroyed in the Palisades fire (54272193113).jpg
-
Created: Taken on 15 January 2025Upload date: 17 January 2025
-
Uploaded: 20 January 2025